Gstuartw,
What is better for the cyclone?
I cannot definitively say which is better: leaving the cyclone (i.e. motor) on for a continuous period or turning it on and off only when needed is best. But by my reasoning, there is a lot of energy required to get the impeller spinning from a cold start compared to keeping the impeller spinning. Even if the motor and impeller assembly are well balanced, starting the CV1800 (my machine) is seems to me to be more stressing on parts than when the cyclone is running. But leaving the CV1800 on when not needed for a prolonged period does not make sense to me since the Cv1800 is consuming about 5.2 kilowatts-hours (22 amps @240 volts).
Running for an hour or two or turning it on and off as needed multiple times? What are your practices?
I usually leave the dust collector running, but not to the extent described by bababrown. I leave the CV1800 running unless I foresee more than a few minutes before making more dust. Probably the longest period the CV1800 has run without collecting dust has been about 15 minutes or so (I have never measured the duration). While this is somewhat nebulous, I can say that I do not turn the CV1800 off after a cross cut of a rough board for the brief time it takes to for me to walk to the jointer, open its blast gate, and begin jointing the cut board; I leave the dust collector running. In short, if I believe that if the cyclone is running too long without sucking dust, I turn it off; otherwise I leave it running. I try not to short-cycle the cyclone whenever I can.